Follow Techotopia on Twitter

On-line Guides
All Guides
eBook Store
iOS / Android
Linux for Beginners
Office Productivity
Linux Installation
Linux Security
Linux Utilities
Linux Virtualization
Linux Kernel
System/Network Admin
Programming
Scripting Languages
Development Tools
Web Development
GUI Toolkits/Desktop
Databases
Mail Systems
openSolaris
Eclipse Documentation
Techotopia.com
Virtuatopia.com

How To Guides
Virtualization
General System Admin
Linux Security
Linux Filesystems
Web Servers
Graphics & Desktop
PC Hardware
Windows
Problem Solutions
Privacy Policy

  




 

 

Eclipse Plug-in Developer Guide
Previous Page Home Next Page

Threading issues

When working with a widget toolkit, it is important to understand the underlying thread model that is used for reading and dispatching platform GUI events. The implementation of the UI thread affects the rules that applications must follow when using Java threads in their code.

Native event dispatching

Underneath any GUI application, regardless of its language or UI toolkit, the OS platform detects GUI events and places them in application event queues. Although the mechanics are slightly different on different OS platforms, the basics are similar. As the user clicks the mouse, types characters, or surfaces windows, the OS generates application GUI events, such as mouse clicks, keystrokes, or window paint events. It determines which window and application should receive each event and places it in the application's event queue.

The underlying structure for any windowed GUI application is an event loop. Applications initialize and then start a loop which simply reads the GUI events from the queue and reacts accordingly. Any work that is done while handling one of these events must happen quickly in order to keep the GUI system responsive to the user.

Long operations triggered by UI events should be performed in a separate thread in order to allow the event loop thread to return quickly and fetch the next event from the application's queue. However, access to the widgets and platform API from other threads must be controlled with explicit locking and serialization. An application that fails to follow the rules can cause an OS call to fail, or worse, lock up the entire GUI system.

SWT UI thread

SWT follows the threading model supported directly by the platforms. The application program runs the event loop in its main thread and dispatches events directly from this thread. The UI thread is the thread in which the Display was created. All other widgets must be created in the UI thread.

Since all event code is triggered from the application's UI thread, application code that handles events can freely access the widgets and make graphics calls without any special techniques. However, the application is responsible for forking computational threads when performing long operations in response to an event.

Note: SWT will trigger an SWTException for any calls made from a non-UI thread that must be made from the UI thread.

The main thread, including the event loop, for an SWT application has the following structure:

   public static void main (String [] args) {
      Display display = new Display ();
      Shell shell = new Shell (display);
      shell.open ();
      // start the event loop. We stop when the user has done
      // something to dispose our window.
      while (!shell.isDisposed ()) {
         if (!display.readAndDispatch ())
            display.sleep ();
      }
      display.dispose ();
   }

Once the widgets are created and the shell is opened, the application reads and dispatches events from the OS queue until the shell window is disposed. If there are no events available for us in the queue, we tell the display to sleep to give other applications a chance to run.

SWT provides special access methods for calling widget and graphics code from a background thread.

Executing code from a non-UI thread

Applications that wish to call UI code from a non-UI thread must provide a Runnable that calls the UI code. The methods syncExec(Runnable) and asyncExec(Runnable) in the Display class are used to execute these runnables in the UI thread during the event loop.

  • syncExec(Runnable) should be used when the application code in the non-UI thread depends on the return value from the UI code or otherwise needs to ensure that the runnable is run to completion before returning to the thread. SWT will block the calling thread until the runnable has been run from the application's UI thread. For example, a background thread that is computing something based on a window's current size would want to synchronously run the code to get the window's size and then continue with its computations.
  • asyncExec(Runnable) should be used when the application needs to perform some UI operations, but is not dependent upon the operations being completed before continuing. For example, a background thread that updates a progress indicator or redraws a window could request the update asynchronously and continue with its processing. In this case, there is no guaranteed relationship between the timing of the background thread and the execution of the runnable.

The following code snippet demonstrates the pattern for using these methods:

   // do time-intensive computations
   ...
   // now update the UI. We don't depend on the result,
   // so use async.
   display.asyncExec (new Runnable () {
      public void run () {
         if (!myWindow.isDisposed())
            myWindow.redraw ();
      }
   });
   // now do more computations
   ...

It is good practice to check if your widget is disposed from within the runnable when using asyncExec. Since other things can happen in the UI thread between the call to asyncExec and the execution of your runnable, you can never be sure what state your widgets are in by the time your runnable executes.

The workbench and threads

The threading rules are very clear when you are implementing an SWT application from the ground up since you control the creation of the event loop and the decision to fork computational threads in your application.

Things get a bit more complicated when you are contributing plug-in code to the workbench. The following rules can be considered "rules of engagement" when using platform UI classes, although from release to release there may be exceptions to these rules:

  • In general, any workbench UI extensions you add to the platform will be executing in the workbench's UI thread, unless they are specifically related to threads or background jobs (such as background job progress indication).
  • If you receive an event from the workbench, it is not guaranteed that it is executing in the UI thread of the workbench. Consult the javadoc for the particular class that defines the listener or event. If there is no specific documentation discussing threading, and the class is clearly a UI-related class, you may expect that the event arrives in the UI thread of the workbench.
  • Likewise, a platform UI library should not be considered thread-safe unless it is specifically documented as such. Note that most platform UI classes dispatch listeners from the calling thread that triggered the event. Workbench and JFace API calls do not check that the caller is executing in the UI thread.This means that your plug-in may introduce a problem if you call a method that triggers an event from a non-UI thread. SWT triggers an SWTException for all API calls made from a non-UI thread. In general, avoid calling platform UI code from another thread unless the javadoc specifically allows it.
  • If your plug-in forks a computational thread or uses a workbench Job, it must use the Display asyncExec(Runnable) or syncExec(Runnable) methods when calling any API for the workbench, JFace, or SWT, unless the API specifically allows call-in from a background thread.
  • If your plug-in uses the JFace IRunnableContext interface to invoke a progress monitor and run an operation, it supplies an argument to specify whether a computational thread is forked for running the operation.

 
 
  Published under the terms of the Eclipse Public License Version 1.0 ("EPL") Design by Interspire