Follow Techotopia on Twitter

On-line Guides
All Guides
eBook Store
iOS / Android
Linux for Beginners
Office Productivity
Linux Installation
Linux Security
Linux Utilities
Linux Virtualization
Linux Kernel
System/Network Admin
Programming
Scripting Languages
Development Tools
Web Development
GUI Toolkits/Desktop
Databases
Mail Systems
openSolaris
Eclipse Documentation
Techotopia.com
Virtuatopia.com

How To Guides
Virtualization
General System Admin
Linux Security
Linux Filesystems
Web Servers
Graphics & Desktop
PC Hardware
Windows
Problem Solutions
Privacy Policy

  




 

 

Solaris Volume Manager Administration Guide
Previous Next

Scenario—RAID-5 Volumes

RAID-5 volumes allow you to have redundant storage without the overhead of RAID-1 volumes, which require two times the total storage space to provide data redundancy. By setting up a RAID-5 volume, you can provide redundant storage of greater capacity than you could achieve with a RAID-1 volume on the same set of disk components. In addition, with the help of hot spares (see Chapter 16, Hot Spare Pools (Overview) and specifically How Hot Spares Work), you can achieve nearly the same level of safety. The drawbacks are increased write time and markedly impaired performance in the event of a component failure. However, those tradeoffs might be insignificant for many situations. The following example, drawing on the sample scenario explained in Chapter 5, Configuring and Using Solaris Volume Manager (Scenario), describes how RAID-5 volumes can provide extra storage capacity.

Other scenarios for RAID-0 and RAID-1 volumes used 6 slices (c1t1d0, c1t2d0, c1t3d0, c2t1d0, c2t2d0, c2t3d0) on 6 disks, spread over 2 controllers, to provide 27 Gbytes of redundant storage. By using the same slices in a RAID-5 configuration, 45 Gbytes of storage is available. Also, the configuration can withstand a single component failure without data loss or access interruption. By adding hot spares to the configuration, the RAID-5 volume can withstand additional component failures. The most significant drawback to this approach is that a controller failure would result in data loss to this RAID-5 volume, while it would not with the RAID-1 volume described in Scenario--RAID-1 Volumes (Mirrors).

Previous Next

 
 
  Published under the terms fo the Public Documentation License Version 1.01. Design by Interspire