Follow Techotopia on Twitter

On-line Guides
All Guides
eBook Store
iOS / Android
Linux for Beginners
Office Productivity
Linux Installation
Linux Security
Linux Utilities
Linux Virtualization
Linux Kernel
System/Network Admin
Scripting Languages
Development Tools
Web Development
GUI Toolkits/Desktop
Mail Systems
Eclipse Documentation

How To Guides
General System Admin
Linux Security
Linux Filesystems
Web Servers
Graphics & Desktop
PC Hardware
Problem Solutions
Privacy Policy




Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 Essentials Book now available.

Purchase a copy of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 (RHEL 9) Essentials

Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 Essentials Print and eBook (PDF) editions contain 34 chapters and 298 pages

Preview Book

2. We Need Feedback!

If you find a typographical error in this manual, or if you have thought of a way to make this manual better, we would love to hear from you! Please submit a report in Bugzilla: against the product Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.
When submitting a bug report, be sure to mention the manual's identifier: doc-Deployment_Guide and version number: 6.
If you have a suggestion for improving the documentation, try to be as specific as possible when describing it. If you have found an error, please include the section number and some of the surrounding text so we can find it easily.

2.1. Technical Review Requests

All review requests are classified into one of the following five categories:
New Content
content documented for the first time — an entirely new feature, procedure, or concept. For example: "Section now describes the new procedure for creating bootable USB devices."
a factual error previously present in the text has been corrected. For example: "Section previously stated (incorrectly) that IPv4 and IPv6 were both supported; section now states that IPv6 has never been supported."
material that was already factually correct but is now better explained. Clarifications are usually in response to reader feedback that the previous content was confusing or misleading in some way. For example: "Paths described in Example 1.2.3 now better reflect the directory structure of an actual installed system."
a description of a feature or a procedure has been dropped. Material might be obsolete because of a feature that is no longer supported, a known issue that has been corrected, or hardware that is now obsolete. For example, "Section no longer describes how to update kernel modules using a floppy disk."
a request to check a fact, procedure, or whether material should be obsoleted. For example, "Section describes how to connect to a generic iSCSI storage device. Please verify this on your hardware" or "Section still describes how to update kernel modules using a LS-120 SuperDisk; please verify that we still need to tell readers about this obsolete hardware."

  Published under the terms of the Creative Commons License Design by Interspire