There is little about the general topic of disasters and disaster
recovery that has a direct bearing on any specific operating system.
After all, the computers in a flooded data center will be inoperative
whether they run Red Hat Enterprise Linux or some other operating system. However, there
are parts of Red Hat Enterprise Linux that relate to certain specific aspects of disaster
recovery; these are discussed in this section.
As a software vendor, Red Hat does have a number of support
offerings for its products, including Red Hat Enterprise Linux. You are using the most
basic support tool right now by reading this manual. Documentation
for Red Hat Enterprise Linux is available on the Red Hat Enterprise Linux Documentation CD (which can also
be installed on your system for fast access), in printed form, and on
the Red Hat website at http://www.redhat.com/docs/.
Self support options are available via the many mailing lists
hosted by Red Hat (available at https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo).
These mailing lists take advantage of the combined knowledge of Red Hat's
user community; in addition, many lists are monitored by Red Hat
personnel, who contribute as time permits. Other resources are
available from Red Hat's main support page at http://www.redhat.com/apps/support/.
More comprehensive support options exist; information on them can
be found on the Red Hat website.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux comes with several different programs for backing up and
restoring data. By themselves, these utility programs do not
constitute a complete backup solution. However, they can be used as
the nucleus of such a solution.
As noted in Section 18.104.22.168 Restoring From Bare Metal,
most computers based on the standard PC architecture do not possess
the necessary functionality to boot directly from a backup tape.
Consequently, Red Hat Enterprise Linux is not capable of performing a tape boot when
running on such hardware.
However, it is also possible to use your Red Hat Enterprise Linux CD-ROM as a
system recovery environment; for more information see the chapter on
basic system recovery in the
Red Hat Enterprise Linux System Administration Guide.
The tar utility is well known among UNIX
system administrators. It is the archiving method of choice for
sharing ad-hoc bits of source code and files between systems. The
tar implementation included with Red Hat Enterprise Linux is GNU
tar, one of the more feature-rich
Using tar, backing up the contents of a
directory can be as simple as issuing a command similar to the
tar cf /mnt/backup/home-backup.tar /home/
This command creates an archive file called
/mnt/backup/. The archive contains the
contents of the /home/ directory.
The resulting archive file will be nearly as large as the data
being backed up. Depending on the type of data being backed up,
compressing the archive file can result in significant size
reductions. The archive file can be compressed by adding a single
option to the previous command:
tar czf /mnt/backup/home-backup.tar.gz /home/
The resulting home-backup.tar.gz archive
file is now gzip compressed.
There are many other options to tar; to learn
more about them, read the tar(1) man page.
The cpio utility is another traditional UNIX
program. It is an excellent general-purpose program for moving data
from one place to another and, as such, can serve well as a backup
The behavior of cpio is a bit different from
tar. Unlike tar,
cpio reads the names of the files it is to
process via standard input. A common method of generating a list of
files for cpio is to use programs such as
find whose output is then piped to
find /home/ | cpio -o > /mnt/backup/home-backup.cpio
This command creates a cpio archive file
(containing the everything in /home/) called
home-backup.cpio and residing in the
Because find has a rich set of file
selection tests, sophisticated backups can easily be created. For
example, the following command performs a backup of only those
files that have not been accessed within the past year:
find /home/ -atime +365 | cpio -o > /mnt/backup/home-backup.cpio
There are many other options to cpio (and
find); to learn more about them read the
cpio(1) and find(1) man
The dump and restore
programs are Linux equivalents to the UNIX programs of the same
name. As such, many system administrators with UNIX experience may
feel that dump and restore are
viable candidates for a good backup program under Red Hat Enterprise Linux. However,
one method of using dump can cause problems.
Here is Linus Torvald's comment on the subject:
From: Linus Torvalds
To: Neil Conway
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SMP race in ext2 - metadata corruption.
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 09:59:46 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel At vger Dot kernel Dot org>
[ linux-kernel added back as a cc ]
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Neil Conway wrote:
> > I'm surprised that dump is deprecated (by you at least ;-)). What to
> use instead for backups on machines that can't umount disks regularly?
Note that dump simply won't work reliably at all even in 2.4.x: the buffer
cache and the page cache (where all the actual data is) are not
coherent. This is only going to get even worse in 2.5.x, when the
directories are moved into the page cache as well.
So anybody who depends on "dump" getting backups right is already playing
Russian roulette with their backups. It's not at all guaranteed to get the
right results - you may end up having stale data in the buffer cache that
ends up being "backed up".
Dump was a stupid program in the first place. Leave it behind.
> I've always thought "tar" was a bit undesirable (updates atimes or
> ctimes for example).
Right now, the cpio/tar/xxx solutions are definitely the best ones, and
will work on multiple filesystems (another limitation of "dump"). Whatever
problems they have, they are still better than the _guaranteed_(*) data
corruptions of "dump".
However, it may be that in the long run it would be advantageous to have a
"filesystem maintenance interface" for doing things like backups and
(*) Dump may work fine for you a thousand times. But it _will_ fail under
the right circumstances. And there is nothing you can do about it.
Given this problem, the use of
dump/restore on mounted file
systems is strongly discouraged. However, dump
was originally designed to backup unmounted file systems; therefore,
in situations where it is possible to take a file system offline
with umount, dump remains a
viable backup technology.
AMANDA is a client/server based backup application produced by
the University of Maryland. By having a client/server architecture,
a single backup server (normally a fairly powerful system with a
great deal of free space on fast disks and configured with the
desired backup device) can back up many client systems, which need
nothing more than the AMANDA client software.
This approach to backups makes a great deal of sense, as it
concentrates those resources needed for backups in one system,
instead of requiring additional hardware for every system requiring
backup services. AMANDA's design also serves to centralize the
administration of backups, making the system administrator's life
that much easier.
The AMANDA server manages a pool of backup media and rotates
usage through the pool in order to ensure that all backups are
retained for the administrator-dictated retention period. All media
is pre-formatted with data that allows AMANDA to detect whether the
proper media is available or not. In addition, AMANDA can be
interfaced with robotic media changing units, making it possible to
completely automate backups.
AMANDA can use either tar or
dump to do the actual backups (although under
Red Hat Enterprise Linux using tar is preferable, due to the issues
with dump raised in Section 22.214.171.124 dump/restore: Not Recommended for Mounted File Systems!). As such, AMANDA backups
do not require AMANDA in order to restore files — a decided
In operation, AMANDA is normally scheduled to run once a day
during the data center's backup window. The AMANDA server connects
to the client systems and directs the clients to produce estimated
sizes of the backups to be done. Once all the estimates are
available, the server constructs a schedule, automatically
determining the order in which systems are to be backed up.
Once the backups actually start, the data is sent over the
network from the client to the server, where it is stored on a
holding disk. Once a backup is complete, the server starts writing
it out from the holding disk to the backup media. At the same time,
other clients are sending their backups to the server for storage on
the holding disk. This results in a continuous stream of data
available for writing to the backup media. As backups are written
to the backup media, they are deleted from the server's holding
Once all backups have been completed, the system administrator
is emailed a report outlining the status of the backups, making
review easy and fast.
Should it be necessary to restore data, AMANDA contains a
utility program that allows the operator to identify the file
system, date, and file name(s). Once this is done, AMANDA
identifies the correct backup media and then locates and restores
the desired data. As stated earlier, AMANDA's design also makes it
possible to restore data even without AMANDA's assistance, although
identification of the correct media would be a slower, manual
This section has only touched upon the most basic AMANDA
concepts. To do more research on AMANDA, start with the
amanda(8) man page.